AI Tribune

US · EU · UK

AI Tribune

Every AI law starts as somebody's request.

A dozen trackers tell you what AI regulation says. None tell you who asked for it that way. AI Tribune records the requests: what companies, trade bodies, unions and civil society ask governments to do about AI, in which documents, who pushed back, and whether they got it. Every claim links to the primary source.

The question layer

What the fight is about

All 10 questions
Model governance · open

Should state or federal law govern frontier-model safety?

The central jurisdictional fight in US AI policy. One side asks Washington to preempt or pause state AI statutes, by moratorium, executive action, or a federal framework that displaces state law. The other side asks states to keep legislating in the absence of federal rules, and asks Congress not to strip that authority without replacing it.

Liability · open

Who bears liability when a deployed AI system causes harm?

Whether responsibility for harms attaches to the developer of a model, the deployer who put it in front of users, or nobody without proof of fault, and whether liability relief should be traded for participation in government safety programs.

Copyright & data · open

May developers train on copyrighted works without a license?

Whether training on lawfully accessed copyrighted material is fair use (US), a text-and-data-mining exception with or without opt-out (UK/EU), or an act requiring licenses and remuneration, and what developers must disclose about what they trained on.

The actor table

Who does the asking

All 52 actors

The vehicles

Where asks ride

All 55 instruments

The argument layer

How asks get argued

All 12 frames

Check the work

No claim exists here without a quoted span, a page reference, and a link to the source document. Coverage gaps are stated on the page, not discovered by critics. The whole dataset is free to download.