“In addition, we urge the administration to clarify that existing copyright law protects the ability of developers to train models. Getting this right is critical to ensuring American competitiveness in AI.”
US · FederalExecutive — OSTP / NSF
OSTP Request for Information on the AI Action Plan
The comment docket that shaped the July 2025 AI Action Plan. The single richest single-venue record of who wants what from US federal AI policy.
Coverage accounting
10,068 submissions indexed
- — 10,068 is OSTP's official count of submissions received; this register has not indexed the docket itself — only the self-published submissions cited by claims.
- — No official breakdown of submissions by actor type has been published; none is invented here.
- — Meetings and calls with OSTP staff are not disclosed anywhere and are not in this register.
- — Formal filings over-sample the side with compliance budgets; individual comments are not claim-extracted.
Vehicles carry asks; asks outlive them
Asks on this vehicle
- Wants fewer rulesPreempt or pause state frontier-safety statutesPartially adopted
- Wants more rulesEnact one federal frontier-transparency frameworkActive
- Wants fewer rulesCondition liability relief on federal safety-institute partnershipPartially adopted
- Wants fewer rulesConfirm training on lawfully accessed works as fair use / TDM exceptionActive
- Wants more rulesRequire worker voice in AI deployment decisionsPartially adopted
Sorted by what filers wanted done to the rules
Claims filed here
“Specifically, the nation’s AI policy and AI Action Plan should respect intellectual property, support the development of voluntary licensing in free markets, and promote appropriate transparency and fair competition in the AI and technology sector.”
The filed RFI comments; doc-nma-actionplan-2025 is the accompanying press release.